Enough people have wondered/asked/complained to me about this that I'm
posting this now as a public service.
IBM Model "M" keyboards are still available, *NEW*, today. They are
expensive, but they are the original design that you can use as a melee
weapon. The catch is that they don't say "IBM" or even "Lexmark" on
them. They are available for purchase from the manufacturer, Unicomp,
who can be found online at http://www.pckeyboard.com/.
You can also find some vintage NIB units from time …
[View More]to time at
http://www.clickykeyboards.com/.
There are also a number of other manufacturers now making similar, but
not quite as good, keyboards.
- CVT Inc., the maker of the Avant Stellar (I own two of them), which
is the direct descendant of the Northgate Omnikey, seems to have
restructured and no trace of their keyboard manufacturing operation can
be found online. However, Northgate keyboards are still available
new-in-box from (this is a horrible site, beware)
http://www.northgate-keyboard-repair.com/.
- The Happy Hacking keyboard (now owned by Fujitsu, apparently) is
equally comforting to some people despite having a totally different
feel. They, and many others, can be had from
http://www.elitekeyboards.com/
- Das Keyboard
- Anything using Cherry MX Green, Blue, or White keyswitches. The
"green" switches apparently are the closest anyone's come yet to
emulating the IBM/Lexmark/Unicomp switches... and they can be had in
MUCH cheaper keyboards, like the Rosewill RK-9000
(http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823201040 and
http://techreport.com/review/23405/rosewill-rk-9000-series-mechanical-ke
yboards-reviewed).
- And there are an increasing number (yes, again, after the big die-off
ca. 2009) of speciality manufacturers of "ergonomic" keyboards that are
making clicky keyswitches available as an option. One of the better
ones is a tiny shop in Ontario, but I can't find the name right now.
References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_M_keyboardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicomphttp://deskthority.net/wiki/Cherry_MX
-Adam Thompson
athompso(a)athompso.net
[View Less]
I mentioned this problem at the last round-table session, but didn't get
a solution, so I thought I'd post it here, just in case anyone has any
suggestions to offer.
I'm still seeing a whole bunch of false positives in SpamAssassin, since
an update was installed in mid-September on a CentOS 5.7 system, for a
rule called DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, which is only supposed to be triggered
when the "Date:" header has a date that is 4 days to 4 month ahead of
the date in the "Received" header that …
[View More]has the _smallest_ difference in
date.
Here are the headers from the latest e-mail I've received with this
false-positive. (I've stripped out irrelevant headers, for the sake of
clarity and simplicity.)
From topfivestories(a)messagent.itworldcanada.com Mon Nov 14 07:50:13 2011
Received: from mail.messagent.itworldcanada.com
(mail.messagent.itworldcanada.com [207.112.10.80])
by palladium.cs.umanitoba.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id
pAEDoAxV028594
for <gedetil(a)cs.umanitoba.ca>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:50:12 -0600
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:50:13 -0500
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q,
HTML_MESSAGE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
palladium.cs.umanitoba.ca
Note that I'm calling spamd via the spamass-milter on a system running
sendmail. Note also, that in the above example, the only "Received"
header was the one generated by my own server. (I've had other false
positives, however, with multiple "Received" headers, all of which were
within seconds of the time in the "Date" header.)
Any ideas?
--
Gilbert E. Detillieux E-mail: <gedetil(a)muug.mb.ca>
Manitoba UNIX User Group Web: http://www.muug.mb.ca/
PO Box 130 St-Boniface Phone: (204)474-8161
Winnipeg MB CANADA R2H 3B4 Fax: (204)474-7609
[View Less]
Does anyone have big (like tabloid or bigger) scanner they want to
sell? Even an ancient SCSI or parallel one might be ok. I just want
*big*.
Do they even make scanners bigger than legal or tabloid?
I'm going to make an order for some (print) books from publisher A Book
Apart (USA-based) and wondering if anyone wants to go in on the order with
me. If I can get 3-5 more books in the order I can save more money
(bigger discount) plus split the shipping/brokerage over more books.
Win/win if someone else wanted one of these books in print.
A Book Apart just joined O'Reilly for Safari/ebooks (but not print) and
they seem to produce excellent products. They seem heavily slanted
towards …
[View More]web design (i.e. less programming) yet look interesting/useful
enough for a typical do-it-all web site programmer. Their schtick is to
make books that are short and concise (100-150 pages usually).
If I can reach the 10 book mark it's roughly $13.75(ca$) a print book
(normally $18us), plus shipping (should be only a few bucks a book), plus
USPS/CP duties/taxes (should be under $2 a book). So I'm guessing
$17.50-ish a book (just a guess). You pay actual costs divided by the
book count, no markup.
Here's their catalog, with good writeups and a sample chapter for each:
http://abookapart.com/products/
The ones that look most useful to me are Web Typography and Respnosible
Web Design. It's extremely odd, but almost none of these books show up on
Amazon/Indigo. I guess they are a really new company trying to break into
the mainstream. (I'm in no way affiliated with them.)
Reply to this email (click reply to sender only) if interested, leave the
subject line intact. Thanks!
[View Less]
I'm trying to print a 2-page tax-form-like file to a (fairly) modern
Lexmark E360 printer, using modern CUPS on Linux. If I print it from
evince or xournal PDF viewers, it prints some of page one, then prints a
printer error (probably a PS error) on page 2. If I print it from lpr on
the command line, it prints out fine! The GUI viewers have no problems
printing out other PDFs from what I've tested so far. This setup has no
problems printing emails from Thunderbird nor documents from …
[View More]oowriter.
This is the first issue I've run into since setting it up a year ago.
What could the GUI viewers be doing differently compared to lpr? They
both are using cups, after all. Should I try more GUI viewers? I need a
working GUI option since the user is not command line savvy.
I already checked I had the newest firmware for the printer. I can't
recall how I originally got the CUPS driver for it, but I can probably
check that for newness as well.
Thanks!
[View Less]
Cheaper / crazier yet... Kimsufi.com & soyoustart.com
Regards,
Paul
Trevor Cordes <trevor(a)tecnopolis.ca> wrote:
>https://www.serverpronto.com/accounts/cart2.php?gid=1&pid=446
>
>How are these guys doing $29/mo "dedicated server"? What's the catch?
>They say it's a Xeon 3040 1.9GHz, so that's older/slower, but say I don't
>need speed. RAM 2G is anemic but doable if I don't need much RAM.
>Doesn't say ECC or not, so that's one possible catch (but …
[View More]usually
>Xeon==ECC). No RAID, that sucks, maybe it can be added as a cheap
>upgrade? Network looks very good.
>
>Anyhow, that's 10-20X less than Rackspace wants for ded server. How are
>they doing this? Is there some VM or blade-ish thing going on here? Is
>it really a 1U box (or possibly even smaller form) somewhere just for me?
>_______________________________________________
>Roundtable mailing list
>Roundtable(a)muug.mb.ca
>http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
[View Less]
https://www.serverpronto.com/accounts/cart2.php?gid=1&pid=446
How are these guys doing $29/mo "dedicated server"? What's the catch?
They say it's a Xeon 3040 1.9GHz, so that's older/slower, but say I don't
need speed. RAM 2G is anemic but doable if I don't need much RAM.
Doesn't say ECC or not, so that's one possible catch (but usually
Xeon==ECC). No RAID, that sucks, maybe it can be added as a cheap
upgrade? Network looks very good.
Anyhow, that's 10-20X less than Rackspace …
[View More]wants for ded server. How are
they doing this? Is there some VM or blade-ish thing going on here? Is
it really a 1U box (or possibly even smaller form) somewhere just for me?
[View Less]
sooo... don't remove /bin/plymouth (say, by uninstalling the "plymouth"
package) and still expect your system to boot.
Oh yeah, there's no warning when you removed the plymouth package a week
or two ago.
And there's nothing on screen to indicate what the problem might be, you
*must* have a root password set (sorry, Debian and Ubuntu users who
didn't do that) in order to log into safe mode, run "journalctl -xb" and
see the error where being unable to execute /bin/plymouth is a FATAL error.
…
[View More]Yup, this systemd thing sure makes booting my systems a lot faster...
*&^%$#@!
(And if anyone noticed that the new MUUG mirror server was down for a
while tonight, systemd is the culprit. It also doesn't like filesystems
that take more than a few seconds to mount and/or fsck. Which would not
include a 40TB XFS LVM volume. *&^%$#@! again.)
--
-Adam Thompson
athompso(a)athompso.net
+1 (204) 291-7950 - cell
+1 (204) 489-6515 - fax
[View Less]
Wyatt,
Thanks for your mini-presentation on GoAccess last night. I found the
program useful enough that I've now installed it on the various EL6
systems on which I maintain a web server. I also decided to install it
on both the old and the new MUUG servers. (There was a Debian package
available for it too.)
The EPEL5 repository didn't have it, so I grabbed the source RPM from
EPEL6, and with 2 trivial changes to the .spec file, I was able to build
a binary for EL5. Since it's tiny, …
[View More]I've attached the patch, in case
it's useful to any of you still running EL5.
--
Gilbert E. Detillieux E-mail: <gedetil(a)muug.mb.ca>
Manitoba UNIX User Group Web: http://www.muug.mb.ca/
PO Box 130 St-Boniface Phone: (204)474-8161
Winnipeg MB CANADA R2H 3B4 Fax: (204)474-7609
[View Less]
To follow on Gilbert's RHEL7 firewalld, chrony, etc, questions. I also,
on every new Fedora box (except basic single-user laptops, etc), ditch
NetworkManager, and change MTA back to sendmail. That last one is tricky
as the supported way is a bit weird (but easy when you know the trick):
alternatives --config mta
Make sure you have sendmail rpm's installed first. After you switch to
sendmail you can rpm -e the postfix stuff.
Yes, my boxes are all pretty much Redhat 9.0 (*pre-RHEL*!!!) …
[View More]plus systemd.
Just the way I like it! The things that are supposed to make our lives
"simpler" or "better" just get in the way, slow me down, introduce new
bugs, make me learn a whole new set of quirks, and force me to forget the
old. All pain, and no gain. Change for change's sake. Windows anyone?
[View Less]