However, System Preferences on my Mom's Mac helpfully reports that "Others can manage your computer using the address 10.64.x.y", which doesn't do me any good. Is there a way to get an IP address that I can from Shaw's network?
10.64. indicates Private IP address, and a router being used? so Port Forwarding in that router should be what you need, but thats a Network answer, I do not know alot about how mac's operate.
I imagine that there are much more Mac knowledgable people around then myself...
Kevin
Is your Mom's computer connected directly to the cable modem or is it connected to a router? It sounds like it is connected to a router since the cable modem will hand out routeable IP addresses. If it is connected to a router then you have to make sure the router will pass the VNC port to the Mac.
-- Bill
Kevin Scott wrote:
However, System Preferences on my Mom's Mac helpfully reports that "Others can manage your computer using the address 10.64.x.y", which doesn't do me any good. Is there a way to get an IP address that I can from Shaw's network?
10.64. indicates Private IP address, and a router being used? so Port Forwarding in that router should be what you need, but thats a Network answer, I do not know alot about how mac's operate.
I imagine that there are much more Mac knowledgable people around then myself...
Kevin
Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 15:33:13 Bill Reid wrote:
Is your Mom's computer connected directly to the cable modem or is it connected to a router?
It is connected directly to an Efficient Networks Speedstream 5360 ADSL modem, which apparently does not act as a router (unlike many other Speedstream models).
On my next try, Apple Remote Desktop reported that "others can manage your computer using the address wnpgmb01dc6-yada-yada.dynamic.mts.net", and the Mac's IP number was a sensible value starting with 142 instead of 10. I could use the Java tightVNC client to connect to Remote Desktop using the IP number 127.0.0.1, but it wouldn't connect to the 142.x.y.z address or to the dynamic.mts.net FQDN.
I back up my entire system, including Windows, by copying the entire contents of one drive to another using the dd command (boot to Linux rescue DVD). I have bays that allow me to remove the drives, and after copying father to son I use the son.
During the last backup I had an input error part way through a 100 GB vfat partition. I completed the backup using conv=noerror, and recorded the record number (1MB records). The father drive, containing the error, is a brand new drive.
A windows check of the partition does not reveal any problems.
Presumably, I have a corrupt file on the father, which could be restored from the grandfather. Is there any way I can find which files are on the effected part of the drive?
Dan Martin writes:
I back up my entire system, including Windows, by copying the entire contents of one drive to another using the dd command (boot to Linux rescue DVD). I have bays that allow me to remove the drives, and after copying father to son I use the son.
During the last backup I had an input error part way through a 100 GB vfat partition. I completed the backup using conv=noerror, and recorded the record number (1MB records). The father drive, containing the error, is a brand new drive.
A windows check of the partition does not reveal any problems.
Presumably, I have a corrupt file on the father, which could be restored from the grandfather. Is there any way I can find which files are on the effected part of the drive?
-- -Dan
Dr. Dan Martin, MD, CCFP, BSc, BCSc (Hon), MSc
GP Hospital Practitioner ummar143@shaw.ca (204) 831-1746 answering machine always on
I don't know of any way under Linux to directly determine which file contains a given block on a vfat partition. I do see your quandary though: the file must be found and restored from the grandfather to the son so the corrupt file doesn't keep getting carried forward on the next backup cycle.
The only notion that floated through my head was using other tools under Linux to find the affected file. Will require some script writing and it will only work if the read error is reproducible. You might want to check that using `dd' with the block number against the father and make sure it is a hard error. The process would be
1) Mount the father vfat partition Linux.
2) Use the `find' command to get a list of all files and directories on the father disk. If the error doesn't reproduce this procedure is useless.
3) Loop through all the files and `cat' them each to /dev/null. When an error occurs, print the path of the file on the console.
4) Mount up the grandfather and the son and copy the affect file from the grandfather to the son.
5) Throw away the son. It can't be used for `dd' safely.
If the bad block is in a directory, it should cause all files in the directory a `cat' error. But if there is only one file in the directory, beware, it may take more prodding to determine if the file is bad or the directory is bad.
It's a brute force approach that's for sure. Hoping someone else on the list has a real tool. The best would probably be one that runs on DOS or Windows. I'm thinking way back to the Norton disk utility. It was good for locating bad sectors and determining which file was mangled.
Regards, Daryl Fonseca-Holt