11 May
2005
11 May
'05
6:33 p.m.
Sean,
What do you base this on? Google turns up plenty of references to the gc_timeout method of failover but none are specific on what they mean by "when a route dies".
I can't think of any reason why the kernel would care if the route timed out because the link was down or because the route was down for some other reason.
--
John Lange
President OpenIT ltd. www.Open-IT.ca (204) 885 0872
VoIP, Web services, Linux Consulting, Server Co-Location
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 07:38 -0500, Sean A. Walberg wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2005, John Lange wrote:
>
> > Now your Linux machine is ready to serve as a failover router,
> > automatically and quickly switching to the secondary route every time
> > the primary route fails.
>
> Unfortunately this seems to only monitor link status, which is a terrible
> inidicator of a connection's health. Cable, DSL, and LAN extension don't
> pass along the link status.
>
> Sean
>