When I choose UDP, I get 0.0-15.0 sec 1.88 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 6.154 ms 0/ 1339 (0%)
No packet loss. 0.1% utilization!
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Sean Walberg swalberg@gmail.com wrote:
On a LAN, window sizes aren't going to make that much of a difference.
First look for the usual suspects - errors on the swich port or NIC.
If you can grab a copy of the traffic, such as with tcpdump -w test.pcap tcp port 5001, you can pull it into wireshark and look for TCP zero window conditions, retransmits, and duplicate ACKs. The TCP performance graph will also show whether or not the transmission is stalling.
Is the performance similar using the UDP test? Does it show loss?
Sean
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Kevin McGregor <kevin.a.mcgregor@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying to narrow down where my performance bottleneck(s) is (are). I just ran "iperf" from a Windows PC (XP SP3) to my Ubuntu 9.10 server. With iperf in "server" mode on the PC, and the client running on the Ubuntu machine, I get 0.0-60.0 sec 4.23 GBytes 606 Mbits/sec
Reversed (iperf "server" running on Ubuntu server, client running on the PC), I get 0.0-60.0 sec 1.13 GBytes 162 Mbits/sec
Wha...?? Both client and server runs on the PC report TCP window size to be 8 KB, but the Linux client reports 22.4 KB and the Linux server reports 85.3 KB. Increasing that to 256K on both ends has little effect. Does anyone have any suggestions?
The Windows NIC is a Realtek RTL8169/8110 Family Gigabit Ethernet; the Ubuntu server is using the Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01). Time to replace a NIC or two?
Kevin
Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
-- Sean Walberg sean@ertw.com http://ertw.com/
Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable