Yes, obviously, or AMD wouldn't have designed a processor that way. But I don't actually know the answer to your question.
A quick google search of "ryzen victim cache" (https://lmgtfy.com/?q=ryzen+victim+cache) shows a number of people discussing the issue, but mostly just re-iterating the same points over and over.
-Adam
-------- Original Message --------
SUBJECT: Re: [RndTbl] Ryzen latency (was: Reddit - networking - Can a BSD system replicate the performance of high-end router appliance?)
DATE: 2017-11-16 09:46
FROM: Kevin McGregor kevin.a.mcgregor@gmail.com
TO: Continuation of Round Table discussion roundtable@muug.ca
REPLY-TO: Continuation of Round Table discussion roundtable@muug.ca
The question is, which (types of) applications have sucky performance specifically because of this? It may be a perfectly reasonable design choice for some/many use cases.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Adam Thompson athompso@athompso.net wrote:
I found the thread where Jim Thompson of Netgate (gonzopancho) talks very briefly about the Ryzen cache architecture:
https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/6upchy/can_a_bsd_system_replica... [1]/
-Adam
Links: ------ [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/6upchy/can_a_bsd_system_replica...