Hands down, http://sixxs.net is one of the best tunnel brokers around. I have a 100ms ping to the next hop, and a full /48 of ipv6 space for free. Not to mention, if you can justify why you would need more subnets, they are happy to give them to you.
This is a 6to4 tunnel though, and I use an openbsd box and the gateway..
Just my 2 cents. Rob
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Sean Walberg sean@ertw.com wrote:
If anyone's looking to get started, I'd suggest http://www.tunnelbroker.net/. They'll route you a block over a tunnel. Very easy to get started. The alternative is a 6to4 tunnel which gives you an IPv6 block based on your IPv4 address. If you have a Linux box as the gateway you should run radvd to send out the router advertisements to the machines behind it. Sean
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Gilbert E. Detillieux gedetil@cs.umanitoba.ca wrote:
As an example of how things can be more complicated than might seem at first, consider setting up an e-mail server with the usual raft of anti-spam measures...
http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/e-mail-and-ipv6-what-it-admins-need-to-kno...
Oh yeah, we tend to look up those client addresses a fair bit to determine the client's reputation... When will all that work well under IPv6?
In any case, I'm hoping to spend part of my summer at work reading up on IPv6, and starting a few LAN-based experiments. No word yet on when the UofM will have its router infrastructure IPv6-ready, though.
Maybe Adam and I can compare notes in the fall, and see if either of us is ready to present something on the topic.
Gilbert
On 2011-05-11 20:02, Adam Thompson wrote:
Unfortunately, no-one is willing to be the bad guy in that story... Not even a *country* can really pull it off. Think about how many non-IPv6-capable devices there are out there: virtually every single home router, printer, modem, camera, etc. Now as soon as a flag day is declared, the self-entitled of the world will rise up and say to their government, "who's going to pay for my new equipment?" Never mind that we've all known this day would come for over 10 years...
On the other hand, I might turn out to be the first who actually has to manage a dual-stack network... and be willing to talk about it, anyway. Assuming I'm not on powerful drugs as a result of doing so! Holy **** does it get complicated! -Adam
Trevor Cordestrevor@tecnopolis.ca wrote:
On 2011-05-11 Sean Cody wrote:
Anyone have an interest or are is implementing ipv6 anywhere?
An intro to ipv6 would be a great presentation topic so if you can share your experience, please do!
Seconded. But don't look at me.
Does anyone know when home ISP's like Shaw will start to offer IPv6 to home users? I don't think v6 will go anywhere until the ISP's with their massive IP pools start switching end users to it. Correct?
All of this 6-to-4 stuff seems stupid and overly complex. I would like to just see a day picked where 4 is shutoff and only 6 can be used. We'll all be !@$#%ing our pants for a few days/weeks but then it'll be done.
-- Gilbert E. Detillieux E-mail: gedetil@muug.mb.ca Manitoba UNIX User Group Web: http://www.muug.mb.ca/ PO Box 130 St-Boniface Phone: (204)474-8161 Winnipeg MB CANADA R2H 3B4 Fax: (204)474-7609 _______________________________________________ Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
-- Sean Walberg sean@ertw.com http://ertw.com/
Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable