[*] Re: Asterisk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9

Kevin Scott muug at lighteningsys.ca
Fri Sep 21 21:39:55 CDT 2007


I should have put it in my other post,

Its not voice traffic specifically that the QOS effects, its all traffic through the modem.

Kevin
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sean Walberg 
  To: Kevin Scott 
  Cc: asterisk at muug.mb.ca 
  Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 12:17 PM
  Subject: Re: [*] Re: Asterisk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9


  I'd like to see how Shaw classifies VoIP traffic.  If they don't know it's VoIP they can't give it the right treatment.

  Sean


  On 9/21/07, Kevin Scott <muug at lighteningsys.ca> wrote:
    I'd like to see the same thing done with the E-QOS (enhanced quality of
    service) that Shaw has,  see if your upload speed and/or quality is
    anybetter...

    Kevin


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: < asterisk-request at muug.mb.ca>
    To: <asterisk at muug.mb.ca>
    Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:00 AM
    Subject: Asterisk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9 


    > Send Asterisk mailing list submissions to
    > asterisk at muug.mb.ca
    >
    > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
    > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > asterisk-request at muug.mb.ca
    > 
    > You can reach the person managing the list at
    > asterisk-owner at muug.mb.ca
    >
    > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > than "Re: Contents of Asterisk digest..."
    >
    >
    > Today's Topics:
    >
    >   1. Interesting VoIP results with Shaw (John Lange)
    >   2. Re: Interesting VoIP results with Shaw (John Lange) 
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 1
    > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:40:55 -0500
    > From: John Lange < john.lange at open-it.ca>
    > Subject: [*] Interesting VoIP results with Shaw
    > To: Asterisk SIG <asterisk at muug.mb.ca>
    > Message-ID: < 1190313655.4093.11.camel at ibmlaptop.darkcore.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > As part of some work I was doing for a client I had the opportunity to
    > answer the question "how many simultaneous VOIP calls can a Shaw 
    > connection handle at one time?"
    >
    > The answer surprised me.
    >
    > I was able to sustain 13 calls using g711u with almost no audio drop
    > out. Approximating g711 at 65Kb/s, this means I was getting about 
    > 845Kb/s upstream.
    >
    > It should be noted that the connection was completely idle otherwise.
    >
    > Obviously if we put some compression on it could go much higher.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 2
    > Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:51:21 -0500
    > From: John Lange < john.lange at open-it.ca>
    > Subject: Re: [*] Interesting VoIP results with Shaw
    > To: Asterisk SIG <asterisk at muug.mb.ca>
    > Message-ID: < 1190382681.4028.2.camel at ibmlaptop.darkcore.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > For those that asked, yes it was with the Xtreme-I service. I actually
    > had to look it up on my bill since I couldn't remember what it was 
    > called.
    >
    > John
    >
    > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 21:49 -0500, Rej Lafond wrote:
    >> Hi John
    >>
    >> Was that with High-Speed or High-Speed Xtreme-I?
    >>
    >> Thanks 
    >> Rej
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> John Lange wrote:
    >> > As part of some work I was doing for a client I had the opportunity to
    >> > answer the question "how many simultaneous VOIP calls can a Shaw 
    >> > connection handle at one time?"
    >> >
    >> > The answer surprised me.
    >> >
    >> > I was able to sustain 13 calls using g711u with almost no audio drop
    >> > out. Approximating g711 at 65Kb/s, this means I was getting about 
    >> > 845Kb/s upstream.
    >> >
    >> > It should be noted that the connection was completely idle otherwise.
    >> >
    >> > Obviously if we put some compression on it could go much higher. 
    >> >
    >> > Regards,
    >> >
    >> > John
    >> >
    >> > _______________________________________________
    >> > Asterisk mailing list
    >> > Asterisk at muug.mb.ca
    >> > http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
    >> >
    >>
    > 
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Asterisk mailing list
    > Asterisk at muug.mb.ca
    > http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
    >
    >
    > End of Asterisk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9
    > *************************************** 
    >


    _______________________________________________
    Asterisk mailing list
    Asterisk at muug.mb.ca
    http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/asterisk 





  -- 
  Sean Walberg <sean at ertw.com>    http://ertw.com/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.muug.mb.ca/pipermail/asterisk/attachments/20070921/f08b1d09/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Asterisk mailing list