[*] Changing "reply to" for list

[John Lange]

Interesting. That must be relatively new in mailman.

On the down side, if you use "reply to all" to send, I am also forced to
use "Reply to all" since I didn't get a message from the list and
therefore "reply to list" doesn't work. However, I'm sure I'll survive.

Its rather odd that the most traffic this list has gotten recently is a
discussion of how the list operates ;)

John

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:22 -0600, Bill Reid wrote:
> John Lange wrote:
> > One message goes through mailman, the other goes directly to the sender.
> > 
> > 2 messages. :)
> > 
> 
> I only received one copy of your message even through the header is:
> 
> To: billreid at shaw.ca
> Cc: asterisk at muug.mb.ca
> 
> Perhaps mailman sees that the header contains a direct send so it skips sending 
> via the list. In any case my tests and the message you sent would indicate that 
> it is 1 message not 2  (which is nice).
> 
> -- Bill
>