23 Jun
2023
23 Jun
'23
6:16 a.m.
On 2023-06-23 Adam Thompson wrote:
Probably perfectly legal, but what a way to say F.U. to the Linux community! -Adam
Is this legal, per the GPL? They make modifications, they release binaries (though not for free). Therefore they must release the sources? Releasing a different version (I guess what they'll call their "upstream" may not satisfy the GPL?
Ramifications? I guess this instantly kills Rocky et al and forces everyone on "free RHEL" to buy RHEL? I don't think Rocky et al have the resources to path & update their distro on their own, and in any event, it would no longer be "fully RHEL compatible".
Or am I reading this completely wrong?