Fantastic find, Adam!  And great comments, Trevor.

From my early CD-R days onward, I exclusively used Verbatim DataLife (and later DataLife Plus) media, as they were the only ones that used a polymer instead of dyes, with projected life (of recorded data) of 100+ years.

Hartmut


On Thu 02 May 2024 at 00:02:49 -05:00, Trevor Cordes <trevor@tecnopolis.ca> wrote:
On 2024-05-02 Adam Thompson wrote:
> I wholeheartedly applaud this example of My Tax Dollars At Work!

https://www.canada.ca/en/conservation-institute/services/conservation-preservation-publications/canadian-conservation-institute-notes/longevity-recordable-cds-dvds.html

This is actually a very good article with lots of juicy info.

However, unless I'm missing something, they don't show the data to
support their longevity conclusions in Table 2?

I started optical backups with my current automated method in 2003.  A
few years ago (so ~ 20 year old discs) I took out the first few hundred
discs I burned (CD-R's at the time) and ran them through my checker.
Only one had an issue and only on one ~80MB archive file.  I have a db
that has md5sums for every file so I can easily tell when a file isn't
100% perfect.

That's my empirical result: a 99.99[999...]% success rate on CD-R
longevity.  I think will go through the oldest ones again, as I was
meaning to finish it and write a report...  When I get free time, lol.

I'm intrigued that their chart puts the most common CD-Rs at double
the life of common DVD-Rs!  I hope that's not the case, as most of my
checks have been of my oldest CD-Rs, because I didn't start DVD-Rs until
much later when the price/GB crossed over.  But it is something to take
into account when I set my "re-burn after" tuneable.

I also have a very hard time believing stamped RO DVD (i.e. movies you
buy at the store) are 10-20 years.  I have a ton of DVDs that are more
than 20 years old and have never seen a failure.  Well, kids scratching
them to heck does do them in, but never just bit rot.

Interesting that they put stamped CDs at 50-100, compared to DVD's
10-20... I wonder if the general longer life of CD* over DVD* has a lot
to do with density and bpi (if there is such a thing in optical): less
dense (more dye area per bit) being more forgiving?

I also have a vaaaast CD collection and follow things on discogs quite
closely and can report that a miniscule number of (stamped) (music) CDs
suffer bit rot, which jives with the 50-100 years in Table 2, because
the oldest of these are around 40 years (yikes!).  The notorious bit
rot ones result in practically everyone's copy becoming an error-filled
mess in roughly the same 5-10ish year window, usually after around 10-15
years.  And they are almost certainly due to horrifically bad QA at the
factory for a specific run, not a general failure of the CD technology
itself.

And I'm finally exonerated!!  People always thought I was completely
nuts for only labelling my optical media in the inner circle miles away
from any data-containing layer.  (Now they'll just think I'm nuts for
other reasons!)

As usual, if any member has old DVD-Rs doing nothing and want to donate
to the Trevor Cordes Data Backup Project, bring them to a meeting!
_______________________________________________
Roundtable mailing list
Roundtable@muug.ca
https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable