Ah, so the original PC did simple parity checking only.  And I believe that the PC AT did the same (definitely not less).  However, very many PC clones right from the beginning never did even simple parity checking (and often had no DMA either, which the PC and PC AT had), and that set the trend toward no checking at all in the whole realm of consumer computers.  By the time laptops came along, this was the norm, and only a few really high-end laptops ever did even simple parity checking (let alone ECC).
 
By the way, ECC in the PC realm uses the same 9-bit RAM as for simple parity checking, but uses the parity bits over a whole block of bytes to do ECC.  Doing ECC on a per byte basis would require 11-bit RAM.
 
Hartmut W Sager - Tel +1-204-339-8331, +1-204-515-1701, +1-204-515-1700, +1-810-471-4600


On 28 January 2017 at 08:00, Kevin McGregor <kevin.a.mcgregor@gmail.com> wrote:
The original PC had parity checking only. I don't know how long ago that stopped. Or did it?

Kevin

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Hartmut W Sager <hwsager@marityme.net> wrote:
Just for the record here (i.e., moral support for you, Trevor), I too have always been a strong believer in ECC.  And heck, the original IBM PC had ECC (or did it just do parity checking, and crash if parity error?).
 
Hartmut W Sager - Tel +1-204-339-8331


On 28 January 2017 at 00:46, Trevor Cordes <trevor@tecnopolis.ca> wrote:
I'm looking for input from anyone in the club who may be knowledgable,
eyeballing, or has purchased a "workstation" system recently with ECC
memory.  (Note, ECC is imperative!)  I don't need dual-socket, crazy
speed, just something like a mid-range modern i7 with modern RAM, slots,
etc.  (i3 speeds won't cut it.)



_______________________________________________
Roundtable mailing list
Roundtable@muug.ca
https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable



_______________________________________________
Roundtable mailing list
Roundtable@muug.ca
https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable