Ah, thanks for the clarification.  You're right about what I was thinking of.  That's the trouble with having been around "back then".  :)
 
Although I did know that VESA was/is also an association, I didn't know of anything they had done since the VESA LocalBus days, especially not that all-important mounting hole spacing on the back of LCD's.  Being able to flip resolutions with generic (VESA) "commands"/register-pokes/whatever is a great idea.
 
Hartmut Sager



On 8 October 2013 09:36, Adam Thompson <athompso@athompso.net> wrote:
On 13-10-07 10:08 PM, Hartmut W Sager wrote:
VESA???  I think VESA is from the 80386/80486 era, and that even Pentium 1 (desktop) computers started adopting the PCI bus for several reasons, including the replacement of the short-sighted VESA bus.  So, a Pentium 3 should heavily post-date VESA.  Roundtable mailing list Roundtable@muug.mb.ca http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
Yes and no.

You're thinking of the VESA LocalBus slot, which was short-sighted only in the sense that it was designed by a bunch of video card mfgrs to make their products look good - it did exactly what it was supposed to, and it was cheap enough that m/b mfgrs (mostly) just implemented it without putting up a fight.

However, VESA, the association, continues to define standards for video-related things today.  Some of the most important bits are the spacing of the mounting holes on the back of LCDs (yes, seriously), and a common definition of how to set video cards into a certain resolution with a linear, non-accelerated, frame buffer mapped to a certain address space... this latter piece is what the X "VESA" driver supports, a lowest-common-denominator mode so that you can at least set the resolution correctly on pretty much any video card today.

-Adam

_______________________________________________
Roundtable mailing list
Roundtable@muug.mb.ca
http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable