<div dir="ltr">Sorry about the incorrect subject line and causing unnecessary panic. It is *NOT* remotely exploitable. I read "netfilter" and my brain automatically went to remote vulnerability since protecting against remote threats is what firewalls do.<div><br></div><div>John</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:50 AM Glen Ditchfield <<a href="mailto:GJDitchfield@acm.org">GJDitchfield@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 8:47:48 A.M. CDT John Lange wrote:<br>
> When you're firewall is the vulnerability, it's probably not good.<br>
> Posting for awareness.<br>
> <br>
> <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25636" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25636</a><br>
> <br>
> John<br>
<br>
I suppose CVE numbers are given out sequentially?  And we're at 25,636, <br>
in mid-March?  Seems like it was only yesterday when they had to expand <br>
the CVE ID format beyond 4 digits...<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Roundtable mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Roundtable@muug.ca" target="_blank">Roundtable@muug.ca</a><br>
<a href="https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>John Lange<br><br></div></div></div>